44830 items (10040 unread) in 60 feeds
Blogger
(1934 unread)
Web2.0
(581 unread)
OpenSource
(1560 unread)
TechTrend
(1196 unread)
Database
(531 unread)
News
(3472 unread)
ITReview
(66 unread)
Geeks
(645 unread)
LifeMusic
(55 unread)
OpenSource (64 unread)
Oliver Ding has made an amazing Freesouls slide show and has shared it on SlideShare. Wow!
Oliver also started a freesouls group on SlideShare.
Kevin Charman Anderson explores this year's ETech theme and wonders about submitting a proposal. Read more of his thoughts here.
Christian Lupp is really looking forward to his talk at RailsConf Europe:
From Sept. 2nd to Sept. 4th 2008 the Ruby on Rails community will meet at the RailsConf Europe. It’s the third RailsConf in Europe and it will located in Berlin/Germany again. Last year, more than 800 Rails enthusiasts joined the conference - a great developer community event - and always the chance to drink your coffee besides one of the creative minds of the Rails Core team ;-) There is nothing that can replace the face-to-face communication within the community. So, I can warmly recommend joining the conference in Berlin to every Rails developer who is able to get there. And all those, who want to develop elegant web applications and do not work with Ruby on Rails yet - they should join us more than ever.
Read his whole post here.
I'm just finishing the grading for the KMD Digital Journalism class that I taught at Keio. It really was a great experience and I'm looking forward to keeping in touch with the class. We've decided to keep the class together as an extracurricular project and the students will continue to work on their projects even though the class is officially over.
The class was divided into four teams. Each team had to organize a theme, at least one interview and their own method of output. Since we had less than one week, these projects are still a work in progress, but I think they made substantial progress considering the time constraints. (It was also the end of the school term and they were heavily loaded with other classwork.)
The four projects are:
1Ds - Digital Media Policy throughout the World ( site / blog )
Kyah! - Search Engines and the Future of Search ( site / blog )
OCTOPAS - How non-Japanese view the Japanese ( site / Interviews )
Sandwich - What is Photo Journalism? ( site / blog / video )
Your feedback and comments on their projects would be greatly appreciated.
Sorry about the delay. We've posted some notes from the June 2008 Creative Commons Board Meeting. Let me know if you have any questions.
I admire the audacity of what IBM is trying to do with its “Linux on a stick” program.
(This picture first appeared at our fine Apple Core blog in November. Say hi to Jason and David for me.)
It is amazing how cheap stick memories have gotten. Down at the local Fry’s you can get an 8 Gbyte stick for $35. I’m old enough to remember 5 1/4 floppies with 128Kbytes. (Hey, Sparky, today’s 6th graders have no memory of 9/11.)
But the hardware side of this remains a big problem, as I’m learning in my Linux laptop experiment.
It’s the channel, stupid. IBM abandoned PC retailing when it sold its PC business to Lenovo of China, four years ago now, but here in the world the channel is where we get our stuff.
So I used my fingers to do a little shopping and educate Big Blue.
When it comes to new hardware, most makers charge you for Windows even if you don’t get it. They do this to maintain their relationship with Microsoft.
Sometimes they’ll load something like FreeDOS on for you, but the cost of Windows is usually baked-into the price you pay.
Small dealers, like LinuxCertified, sell Linux-only laptops, but given their small quantities their rock-bottom price can be higher than what you’d pay for a similar Windows machine.
Given the fact that it takes less power and storage to run Linux than it does Vista, a used market might sound nice. But the savings aren’t huge and who are you dealing with?
The target market for Linux on a stick may be existing Windows users, but if your Windows laptop is working why do you want to get (and learn) a second OS, unless you are (like me) really, really motivated?
And then, as I noted in the first episode of this series, my story started when my Windows hardware fried. I need both hardware and software to happen.
This weekend I’m going to drop by some stores, get funny looks from clerks, and maybe take pictures of those funny looks for your amusement.
But, personally, I won’t be amused.
(Jeff Dunham, who performs Jose Jalapeno on a stick (left) is very amusing.)
For the Linux laptop to be more than a hobbyist toy it needs a wider channel.
Linux (on a stick) won’t do the job.
Tim Bray offers more notes on his OSCON Keynote:
Here are all the missing pieces, should you want to watch it (only 15 minutes, remember); plus a little extra commentary.
IBM is enlisting the help of the top three Linux distributors to help its desktop Office and messaging software gain ground. It’s a small step forward but Big Blue must reach out to the masses to win this game.
At LinuxWorld, IBM announced that Canonical/Ubuntu, Novell and Red Hat have agreed to work with their PC partners to deliver a Linux desktop based on Lotus Notes and recently released Lotus Symphony by 2009. The company did something similar at its LotuSphere 2008 in January, by partnering with distros and adding an e-mail client to the mix. What a concept.
The announcement at LinuxWorld coincides with IBM’s 10-year anniversary of investing in Linux. Still, IBM’s Lotus Symphony – based on OpenOffice — was announced only a year ago and only recently shipped in June.
It’s not a bad idea, but my take is that IBM must dig deep and invest heavily in marketing and advertising to drive more general consumer acceptance about its open source Office. Techies know that OpenOffice exists and may need to be told that IBM is now shipping its own flavor. But more significantly, Big Blue has to tell ordinary consumers.
IBM, like Sun, is trying to drive more sales of the open source Office suite against the more ubiquitous Microsoft Office and gain steam as Google Apps takes hold. Although acceptance of the open source desktop has lagged adoption on the server, IBM hopes slower adoption of Microsoft’s latest operating system and the economic downturn elevate its prospects. It may — but only if the company targets everyday users via mainstream TV, radio and Web sites.
“The slow adoption of Vista among businesses and budget-conscious CIOs, coupled with the proven success of a new type of Microsoft-free PC in every region provides an extraordinary window of opportunity for Linux,” said Kevin Cavanaugh, vice president for IBM Lotus Software, in a press release issues Tuesday night. “ We’ll work to unlock the desktop to save our customers money and give freedom of choice by offering this industry leading solution.”
The bundle being proferred will include Symphony, Notes and Lotus SameTime IM with the Linux distribution of each vendor, along with applications and services from local IT dealers that sell it.
IBM claims that Austrian IT firm VDEL debuted the first offering named OpenReferent in Eastern Europe earlier this year with IBM’s OCCS on Red Hat Enterprise Linux and customers using it have enjoyed savings of between 30 and 35 percent compared to Microsoft Office.
As Dana points out, tapping the channel is a good move. IBM has driven and enjoyed its share of success in the Linux market and in open source in general. With Linux, it invigorated its free fall mainframe business and most forcefully demonstrated Linux’s ability to run across many platforms and architectures with little rework. Its leadership with Eclipse and participation in many open source projects is well known.
IBM has advocated Linux on the desktop for some time but its embrace of OpenOffice (until June) has been less enthusiastic. Its chief rival, Sun, after all, is driving the project. But IBM’s delivery of its Lotus OpenOffice derivative — just two months ago — has given advocates of open source Office more hope.
IBM is wise to try to push its desktop through Linux distributors and through the channel but it must invest heavily in marketing and advertising to make consumers – home users and business consumers alike — more open to a Microsoft Office alternative. End user resistance to change and high costs of retraining users are commonly cited as chief reasons why the open source desktop has faltered. IBM claimed in the late 90s that it would invest more than $1 billion to make Linux succeed against Windows — and it has largely succeeded on the server. Now it must dig deeper to make it happen on the desktop.
I have covered the Linux desktop for 10 years myself and have found it frustrating that open source vendors have largely failed to target mainstream consumers. Unlike most open source projects and backers of OpenOffice, IBM has the marketing dollars to shift public perception. Selling Linux on the server to IT pros required some investment but selling the Linux-OpenOffice desktop to consumers is going to require an even bigger investment than Big Blue shelled out to win the server market in its first 10 years. Will IBM shell out another $1 billion to win in the desktop market?
IBM remains a quiet, background presence at LinuxWorld, 10 years after it began supporting the open source operating system.
But it has some great ideas.
Eclipse was a great idea. Here’s another: an IBM software appliance toolkit gives VARs a single stick memory or DVD they can install to get vertical market customers going.
The idea, the company says, is to get customers rolling in one-to-five mouse clicks.
Developing a channel is the key to increasing business market share, and software appliances can do that.
Now if they could give me one for desktop Linux, I could turn any PC into a Linux laptop.
If we are to see real competition, in wireless or broadband, it’s time for Google to take out Sprint.
Since making its deal with Sprint and Clearwire to deliver WiMax nationwide last year, Google has been very quiet in the wireless services area.
Meanwhile, Sprint Nextel has continued to fade, losing another $344 million last quarter, announcing plans to sell $3 billion in preferred stock. It has proven a bad investment for the institutions which own over 90% of the common.
While tests and deployment of WiMax are moving ahead, no one trusts the Sprint brand (and with good reason — I’m a dissatisfied customer). It actually lost 901,000 customers last quarter.
The answer is simple. Buy the preferred, becoming Sprint’s largest shareholder. Then, with institutional support, change the brand name to Google Wireless. Or Google Clearwire.
Customers will immediately give the company a second chance. Google gets a large retail network for pushing Android phones and WiMax cards, as well as Google swag and the Google brand.
As the WiMax services come on-stream, it puts pressure on shares of Verizon and AT&T, forcing them to maintain network neutrality to retain market share.
AT&T is well aware of the threat, which is why it has spent the last year before the FCC, trying to delay the Sprint-Clearwire transaction.
Putting Google’s name forward would not add further delays, in my view, it would actually accelerate the deal’s acceptance by focusing public attention on it.
So why not? For little more than twice what it paid for YouTube, Google can be a player in both wireless and broadband. Its market presence would do more to assure network neutrality than all the FCC-Comcast hearings in the world.
Virtualization from Virtualogix can transform today’s mobile phones into Linux-based mobile Internet terminals in one product generation.
Founder Michel Gien will describe to LinuxWorld how this is done tomorrow, calling it a “Killer App Enabler or Atomic Fly Swatter.”
Gien, who previously co-founded Chorus Systems, now part of Sun, told ZDNet his software can jump-start the necessary replacement of the Real Time Operating Systems (RTOS) phones have been using with mainstream systems like Linux.
“High end innovation is going to come through the user community, through new people, through high level applications,” he said, and open source Linux is the best way to do that.
“Over the long term, virtualization is going to change the way software architecture works.”
Virtualogix lets these applications come to phones without extensive re-engineering. “Linux can replace RTOSs while the RTOS is still there to support the wireless stack,” and Virtualogix has joined the LiMo Foundation to push that idea.
What this means is the user interface is the only bottleneck preventing the market from emulating what the iPhone can do.
The mobile market of 2010 will look entirely different from what you see today.
AshMUG member John Clark soaks in the best of O’Reilly’s convention in his special guest column.
RIchard MacManus supports the "Web Meets World" Auction by offering free passes for the best auction item ideas:
This year the Web 2.0 Summit conference (5-7 Nov) is hosting an auction to benefit a few innovative organizations that are solving big problems.
To show our support for this initiative, ReadWriteWeb is running a competition in this post.
From ETech chair Brady Forrest:
ETech's CFP has launched. The theme this year is Living, Reinvented: The Technology of Abundance and Constraints. To that end I spent time with MITs Scratch Team (changing computer education) and the RoboScooter team (changing transportation). We're going to explore the following themes.
Esther Schindler came home from OSCON with thoughts on growing the size of the pool in open-source development communities. And it's all upbeat news.
Michael Dory, Adam Simon, and Scott Varland of Socialbomb presented a tutorial on Arduino hacking at last month's O'Reilly Open Source Convention:
Arduino is an open-source electronics prototyping platform based on flexible, easy-to-use hardware and software. It's intended for artists, designers, hobbyists, and anyone interested in creating interactive objects or environments.
In this tutorial, participants will learn how to create devices for sensing and communicating with the physical world using the Arduino platform.
Read the rest">[http%3A] of the tutorial.
Sebastopol, CA--Co-presenters O'Reilly Media and Ruby Central have unveiled the program for RailsConf Europe, the official trusted event for the Rails Community in Europe on 2-4 September, 2008, in Berlin, Germany. Organizers have extended early registration until 30 July, offering community members the chance to save up to 150.
"RailsConf Europe is in its third year, and like Rails itself, it's an established presence but one with energy and real freshness. This year we've added some more presentations to the schedule, and we've got a great lineup of keynote talks and sessions centering around the Rails core team and both the present and future of Rails," says program chair David Black. "The presentation schedule is packed with focused, technically informative talks from experts in everything from security to internationalization to deployment, metaprogramming, database and UI engineering--the whole range of Rails activity and interest. The Rails scene, like the Ruby scene, has always been vibrant and rich in Europe, and we're tapping right into it."
The LiMo Foundation was very proud to deliver 7 new LiMo phones this week in time for LinuxWorld.
I checked them out. There’s one problem with all of them.
They’re phones.
The iPhone, the device these guys claim to be competing with, is not a phone. It’s an Internet terminal, and a phone. It is primarily a data device. And not little dribs of data, either, but great heaping gobs of it.
These phones aren’t, not really.
Basically, LiMo gave LinuxWorld a song-and-dance, talked about new partners, threw some chaff, but they did not deliver what we’re looking for, a mobile Internet terminal that can go head-to-head against the iPhone.
The problem of carrier control is a global one. Japanese carriers are no less prone to charging by the eyedropper, and demanding big chunks of the resulting revenue, than American carriers.
Apple made AT&T swallow the Internet and like it. AT&T has benefitted. For other carriers, or phone makers, to catch up they have to recognize this fact.
It’s not a phone. It’s a data terminal. Think browsing. Not texting, not TV, not cameras. Make this page look good, and you’re at least talking my language.
Until then, sayonara LiMo.
No. The anti open-source gremlins did not write Microsoft’s latest annual report.
(Today’s inconvenient truth. I saw George H.W. Bush in a Levi’s Gremlin just like this one, in 1974, outside the Republican National Committee.)
While there are now breathless headlines reading “Microsoft warns of open source threat,” we’re really talking about something far less sinister, the section of its 10-K report headlined “risk factors.”
Anyone who questions that open source is a risk to Microsoft’s future profitability is not paying attention, and the company would have been grossly remiss in not pointing this out to investors and potential investors.
Admittedly, some of the wording is a bit snarky:
These firms do not bear the full costs of research and development for the software. Some of these firms may build upon Microsoft ideas that we provide to them free or at low royalties in connection with our interoperability initiatives.
But how else are you going to put it?
The same section addresses the risk from ad-based software as a service (SaaS), admitting that the model is viable and Microsoft is trailing.
Most of the section is very fairly worded, and might lead a casual reader to assume Microsoft is doomed. But that’s just good drafting.
Microsoft is not doomed. Microsoft faces real competition from open source. Competition is a good thing. But it is also, in terms of any annual report, a “risk factor.”
(Like the risk some future tech reporter spies you in a 1974 Gremlin.)
Our good friend Ricky Montalvo and his crew shot some great footage at OSCON. Check out their coverage and conversations here. Fishsticks?
Climate Matters: Inspire Your Next President
Brighter Planet and 1Sky are inviting Americans everywhere to participate in a contest to inspire our next president and political leadership on climate change. Between July 31std and September 22nd, Climate Matters contestants will upload a 30 or 60 second video representing their best attempt at delivering a compelling message to the next president and their political leaders to encourage bold action on climate change. A select panel of prominent judges will choose the winner amongst those ten videos which have accrued the most views in a single day. The contest will take place during both the summer Congressional recess and during the height of the presidential campaign season. To elevate the issue of climate change in the Congressional and the presidential campaigns, 1Sky will organize a strategic D.C.-based event for media and policymakers in early October to highlight the top 10 videos. We are also investigating multiple additional pathways for raising the profile and impact of the video submissions and winners.
Gillian Caldwell, the former ED of WITNESS and one of my heroes is the campaigned director of 1Sky. 1Sky is her "new thing" which I think is a super-important and exciting initiative. Please get involved and help out.
Given how often I have railed here about the Bit Trust, the government-enabled duopoly of phone and cable giants controlling the American Internet, you would think I’d be thrilled about the FCC’s latest Comcast ruling.
Nope. And not for the reason you might think, namely that it’s toothless, symbolic, worthless in the real world.
It’s because it is, or was, unenforceable. It’s a bit like some rulings from the late 1930s, demanding that radio stations remain inside their designated bands, at a time when frequency analyzers took weeks to do that calculation.
The answer came quickly, and gave birth to Silicon Valley. It’s told well in Mike Malone’s Bill & Dave. It was a real-time frequency counter, first sold as the 500a in 1943. (Picture from HP Memory.org.)
Only when you could measure waves accurately could you guarantee a civilian broadcaster wasn’t interfering with military frequencies. The law needed an enforcement mechanism.
The same is true for “net neutrality,” which means giving customers full access to the Internet services they are paying for. Unless consumers can catch their ISP in the act of denying them service, they can’t enforce the rule. You have anarchy.
The answer is Switzerland, a tool released today (in a very early form) by the Electronic Frontier Foundation.
The software determines when packets are dropped, forged or modified, and will be improved to let you collect a host of statistics on network performance to your PC.
EFF Switzerland does for today’s Internet consumer what the 500a did for yesterday’s radio station manager. It gives you the tools needed to demand enforcement of government orders.
So Comcast, and their phon-e brethren, will have a choice. They can either admit to violating consumer contracts, or rewrite those contracts and give consumers the power to choose another ISP.
My guess is they’ll do a rewrite, at which point consumers will recognize they don’t have any choice, at which point the game will truly be afoot. Sometime next year.
It’s the next President’s FCC nominations that will tell the tale on network neutrality. And whether they’re willing to enforce anti-trust laws again.
My recent call for a Linux laptop drew a lot of response and several kind e-mails.
Several vendors were said to be shipping such laptops. Lenovo, with SUSE Linux on it. Everex. Dell. Asus. A desktop “shootout” is planned this week at LinuxWorld.
I sort of expected a vendor representative to write and offer a unit, but that did not happen. This may tell more about the state of this market than anything else.
In fact, most of those who wrote in suggested I either make one myself, by buying a cheap laptop and installing a distro, or have one custom made for me.
Paul Rescino of PCA+ Computers near Chicago suggested he could sell me an Equus or Lenovo laptop with Ubuntu on it, which is a very kind offer.
But it brings up a key question. Is this a make market or a buy market? In a buy market, you go to the store and get one, or someone ships it to you. In a make market, you get parts shipped to you and become your own OEM.
Because Linux requires less storage, less RAM, and less chip speed to run than Windows Vista, it seems to mostly be a make market. You’re not going to get a deal buying something new, so why not refurbish something old that you’ll like?
Fair enough. So what do I really want in laptop hardware?
Everything else is optional. I assume this unit has the power to run common open source applications like Open Office, Firefox, etc.
One of my intentions is to see just how much of a Windows box I can emulate, in terms of an application set, so extra memory is welcome.
But I’m not really very picky. What I’m describing is fairly low-end, borderline obsolete hardware. I’m not running Windows Vista, after all.
So what do you say?
The LiMo Foundation has no intention of fading away.
At the launch of LinuxWorld Expo in San Francisco today, the foundation announced the release of several new Linux-based mobile handsets from Mototorola, NEC and Panasonic.
The addition of these latest models — including Motorola’s Motozine ZN5, NEC’s Foma N906i, N906iμ, N906iL and N706i, and Panasonic’s own Foma P906i and N906iμ — brings the total number of LiMo handsets to 21, the foundation announced today.
Several of these models incorporate mobile 2.0 features such as higher resolution displays, international 3G/High-Speed Downlink Packet Access (HSDPA) roaming capabilities, Global Positioning System (GPS), mobile TV and advanced video streaming, secure payment and advanced mail functionalities, the foundation announced.
LiMo’s Linux reference platform is one of several open source mobile platforms under development, including Google’s Android platform (also based on a Linux derivative) and Nokia’s plans for an open source platform based on the Symbian mobile OS platform, acquired earlier this summer.
Some have suggested that LiMo — a foundation founded in 2007 by six mobile manufacturers which now has more than 50 backers — will fade away amidst competition from Google and Nokia. But LiMo said it has no intention of going away and notes that Nokia is a member of the LiMo Foundation.
“Nokia should be lauded for its step in the right direction,” according to a release issued after Nokia announced plans to opne source Symbian over time. “It should also be noted that Nokia has its feet firmly planted in both the Linux and Symbian camps as members of the Linux Foundation, the Limo Foundation and creators of the N Series Mobile Linux device.”
Still, it’s not clear how long that will last. Nokia said the ”Symbian Foundation software will be released under a royalty-free license for foundation members as open source within two years, with the intent to use the Eclipse Public License.”
In response to questions about its commitment to the LiMo Foundation, Nokia said this:
“Our commitment remains to S60 on Symbian OS (and ultimately the Symbian Foundation platform) as our platform for converged mobile devices (or smartphones, as Symbian refers to them). However, we alre already producing mobile devices based on maemo Linux, our Internet tablet devices, we continue to see a strong role for Linux in that class of devices and will continue development,” said Mark Durrant, a spokesman for Nokia.
“With regard to LiMO, there are several different fora and consortia producing specifications and various technical and other documents to support development of mobile technologies. Nokia is constantly evaluating opportunities and is actively participating in some of those fora, such as the Open Mobile Alliance and Open Mobile Terminal Platform alliance. LiMo is certainly an interesting forum and we will consider in good time what kind of role Nokia should seek to have in this forum, if any.”
Got a spare server sitting around?
Nothing fancy — 512 Megs of RAM and a 1.8 GHz processor will work fine.
Now, want to turn that into a networking box? The equivalent of a Cisco or Juniper router with 1 Gbps capacity?
That’s the promise of the Vyatta 2501, shipping today at LinuxWorld. It’s almost beside the point to mention it’s all open source.
I chatted about all this last week with vice president of strategy Dave Roberts, the company’s vice president of strategy.
“The product is fundamentally the software that can be packaged, either in our own hardware or a customer’s own hardware,” he said.
In other words if you want something that looks like an expensive Cisco or Juniper box, Vyatta will sell you one. Or you can find a spare server in the closet and download it.
“A gigabit Ethernet card for a Cisco router costs $5,000. A gagabit gigabit Ethernet card for Vyatta costs $50 and you can buy it at Fry’s. Or call the Geek Squad. That’s a huge difference in the economics.
“They both perform the same way. In some ways the open solutions perform better. The same or better performance for one-quarter the cost.”
This has enormous implications for the corporate networking space, but perhaps even bigger implications in public networking, where telcos insist they can’t keep up with demand.
“We have many customers who are Tier II and Tier III hosting providers,” ISPs that need big connections to the Internet. Vyatta also lets you aggregate local traffic on ordinary servers, great if you can get control of some local customers.
So who is calling, I asked. Everyone, Roberts said. But especially companies that want to build their own server clouds.
“We’re getting a lot of interest from people with cloud environments. They can use it in ways they can’t use a physical unit.”
How so? “Vyatta is software. It all becomes about things like virtualization and the ability to reconfigure, to reprovision. The fact you’ve got network infrastructure that’s fungible is really interesting to folks who build out large scale.”
As much as people may rail about Microsoft, it’s the telcos and their high-priced suppliers who are the real bottleneck in terms of improved computing.
Vyatta has just blown them out of the water.
You’d never know this from a casual visit but JasperSoft has outsourced its community forge site.
Which is the point, you don’t need to know. It’s still Jaspersoft.org. It’s just running on the software, the servers, and with the help of EssentiaESP, which launched at OSCON.
The only evidence of a vendor is down at the bottom of the page, a small Essentia bug and an “About Essentia” link. The branding, the trade dress and the content all come from JasperSoft.
Essentia CEO Gopi Ganapathy said the trend away from Sourceforge and toward homegrown forge sites made sense until communities like JasperSoft’s grew to 50,000 dedicated users and more. Now they need help.
“Our goal is to build vibrant communities faster, cheaper, and better than they’re doing now,” he said.
In the case of JasperSoft:
We offer electronic support for the infrastructure. We have add-ons that allow them to pick up our community manager. Over time it’s our intention to offer fairly significant services because we have been in the space for 10 years.
Essentia’s ambition is to link the communities it’s managing. “Integrating and federating the communities is happening at multiple points, so you get a community of communities happening. That’s a big capability – you get layers of networks.”
If it works out, the communities Essentia manages become bigger, more complex, and more integrated than Sourceforge ever was. But you’ll never know it.
That’s the way Ganapathy and his team want it.
There’s a dose of irony here. Companies left Sourceforge to gain more control of their communities. Now they’re outsourcing those same sites. Essentia ate Sourceforge’s lunch and they never even heard the dinner bell.




cathayan.org 版权所有。
Andrew Savikas, chair of the O'Reilly Tools of Change for Publishing Conference, on The Times and Derek Gottfrid's presentation at OSCON:
But there's something going on at the Times that probably won't make it to Silicon Alley Insider, much less the mainstream business press, and it's something that's starting to make me think the Times just might succeed in adapting to the changing rules of the media and publishing game (though there will almost certainly be many more casualties before it's over).
So what's the Times doing that's so important? They're hacking.
Read the rest of the story.
Slashdot on some of OSCON's greatest hits:
An anonymous reader writes "Infoweek wraps last week's event with Inside The OSCON 2008 Conference, which pulls together interviews with Mark Shuttleworth, Linux Foundation's Jim Zemlin, MySQL's Zach Urlocker and Sam Ramji, who directs Microsoft's Open Source Lab. Best quotes: 'We will make a significant attempt to elevate the Linux desktop to the point where it is as good or better than Apple,' from Shuttleworth; and 'If I would start a business tomorrow I'd do it in the netbook marketplace. I'd build a dead-simple $200 device that targets sports fans, women over forty,' from Zemlin."
Serdar Yegulalp brings all his OSCON coverage together.
We round up our coverage of the open source OSCON 2008 conference. Don't miss Q&As with Ubuntu's Mark Shuttleworth and The Linux Foundation's Jim Zemlin. Check out the photo gallery, too.
See all of Serdar's terrific coverage here.